Extensive legal literature developed debating the ongoing tension between defendant’s liberty rights and public safety. 2095 (1987) produced inconsistent and contradictory positions on the legal function of bail. The acts and case law contained primarily in Stack v. § 3146 ) and the Bail Reform Act of 1984 (18 U.S.C. Legislative attempts to reform bail practices were codified in the Bail Reform Act of 1966 (18 U.S.C. In the 1950s and 1960s a heated debate emerged over the legal function of bail and the legally relevant information upon which judicial officers are to base the severity of bail imposed prior to trial. Studies conducted as early as the 1930s revealed widespread bail practices that detained defendants solely due to the defendant’s inability to meet financial conditions of release. The perennial concern has been the clash between the defendant’s interest in pretrial freedom and the government’s interest to protect the community. NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Sydney.Determining the accused pretrial status requires tracing the interplay between legislative and case law attempts to define the legal function of bail. 2015 “The impact of the NSW Bail Act (2013) on trends in bail and remand in New South Wales”. Institute for Criminal Policy Research, London. 2009 “Pretrial risk assessment in the Federal Court”. NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Sydney. 2016 “A follow up on the impact of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW)”. “The Manhattan Bail Project: An Interim Report on the Use of Pre-Trial Parole”. 2007 “The effect of racial inequality on black male recidivism”. Productivity Commission 2015 Report on Government Services 2015. 2010 “Firm that does dirty work for the government on the cheap”. 2011 Legal Accents, Legal Borrowing: The International Problem-Solving Court Movement. Violence and Mental Disorder: Developments in Risk Assessment. Department of Parliamentary Services, Parliament of Victoria, Melbourne. 2019 No Bail, More Jail? Breaking the Nexus between Community Protection and Escalating Pre-Trial Detention. Pretrial Justice Institute, Rockville, Maryland. 2011 State of the Science of Pretrial Risk Assessment. 2017 “In the US, some criminal court judges now use algorithms to guide decisions on bail”. 1974 An Evaluation of the Pretrial Services Agency of the VERA Institute of Justice. 1979 External validity of research in legal psychology. Congressional Research Service, Washington DC. 2018 Risk and Needs Assessment in the Federal Prison System. 2018 “Despite our fears, we should be wary of harsher bail laws”. 1983 Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail. 2001 “Bailing and jailing the fast and frugal way”. Paper for CRC Project.ĭepartment of Justice (Tasmania) 2018 Reforms to the Tasmanian Bail System: Position Paper. 2018 Bail Decision-Making as an Exercise in Risk Management. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy. 2013 “Looking behind the increase in custodial remand populations”. 2017 “A meta-analytic review of pretrial research: Risk assessment, bond type, and interventions”.
#MANHATTAN BAIL PROJECT FINDINGS FREE#
Free Press, New York.īetchel, K., Holsinger, A., Lownkamp, C. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.īecker, H. 2018 The Bail Book: A Comprehensive Look at Bail in America’s Criminal Justice System. 2014 “Inside the wild, shadowy, and highly lucrative bail Industry”. 2018 “Bail, risk and law reform: A review of bail legislation across Australia”. ABS, Canberra.īartels, L., Gelb, K., Spiranovic, C., Sarre, R. Australian Bureau of Statistics 2018 Criminal Justice Statistics.
0 kommentar(er)
